|
|
Post by Candycab on Oct 5, 2004 1:23:48 GMT -5
The legendary Trash Rally ...ohh I mean Thrash Rally ;D
This game gets hosed constantly ...but in reality its a very playable and almost fun game ...well at least for 5 minutes or so....
Just dont try and compare it to Drift Out or even Over Top ... which I didnt think was all that either ... but what do I know ,I still play my Odyssey 2 and enjoy it ;D
|
|
tsimnami9999
Neo Member
any other time both your asses would be dead right nowt
Posts: 249
|
Post by tsimnami9999 on Oct 6, 2004 18:59:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by papikie2001 on Mar 18, 2005 8:04:05 GMT -5
I ALWAYS RECKONED, EVERY NEO GEO GAME WAS GREAT, THE BAD PART ABOUT THE GAMES IS THE YEAR OF MANUFACTURING, LOOK AT FATAL FURY 1, AND ALL THOSE GAMES CREATED IN THEIR ERA COMPARED TO KNOW THEY ARE JUST OFF.
|
|
ROBOTRON
Neo Member
Neo-Geo Robot
Posts: 139
|
Post by ROBOTRON on Mar 23, 2005 4:13:58 GMT -5
Ragnagard - Bad
Blues Journey - Nope
Thrash Rally - trash
Spinmaster - sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazuya_UK on Mar 23, 2005 10:58:53 GMT -5
I ALWAYS RECKONED, EVERY NEO GEO GAME WAS GREAT, THE BAD PART ABOUT THE GAMES IS THE YEAR OF MANUFACTURING, LOOK AT FATAL FURY 1, AND ALL THOSE GAMES CREATED IN THEIR ERA COMPARED TO KNOW THEY ARE JUST OFF. disagree... Art of Fighting, World Heroes etc etc... they are all old games from that "era", and although they are dated now it was all part of the evolutionary process for SNK... so without those we wouldn't have the newer games. And for the record I still play World Heroes, Fatal Fury 1 etc etc... I guess you just needed to be around back in the day to appreciate them properly - and I've been into Neo stuff since more or less day one  I'd say things for SNK really kicked into gear in 1993 with Samurai Shodown, and then SNK went from being a good developer into a spectacular one when they released Samurai Shodown 2 and KOF 94 ;D Kaz |
|
|
|
Post by RoninBuddha on Mar 23, 2005 11:29:55 GMT -5
when they released Samurai Shodown 2 ;D Kaz COuldnt agree wit you more... back on topic: imo, Ninja Combat sucked... |
|
Harv
Neo Veteran
Did I err??
Posts: 472
|
Post by Harv on Mar 23, 2005 20:36:08 GMT -5
Ninja combat wasn't too bad  but Magician Lord to me sucks ass aswell as Stakes Winner....... |
|
|
|
Post by Candycab on Mar 27, 2005 3:37:22 GMT -5
Ninja combat wasn't too bad but Magician Lord to me sucks ass aswell as Stakes Winner....... Totally agree with the Magician Lord statement...I really dont understand what people see in that game ? I thought it was just horrible all around. I enjoy a quick game of Stakes Winner 2 now and then since its fairly unique to most US gamers, sort of an aquired taste I guess... Number one is about half the game two is ,so I pretty much agree with you on that one. |
|
sepiasongs
Neo Member
"we had a choice, we chose rejoice."
Posts: 213
|
Post by sepiasongs on Mar 27, 2005 18:40:38 GMT -5
disagree... Art of Fighting, World Heroes etc etc... they are all old games from that "era", and although they are dated now it was all part of the evolutionary process for SNK... so without those we wouldn't have the newer games. And for the record I still play World Heroes, Fatal Fury 1 etc etc... I guess you just needed to be around back in the day to appreciate them properly - and I've been into Neo stuff since more or less day one I'd say things for SNK really kicked into gear in 1993 with Samurai Shodown, and then SNK went from being a good developer into a spectacular one when they released Samurai Shodown 2 and KOF 94 ;D Kaz couldn't agree with you more. to say fatal fury 1 is shite because its not garou:motw is just anacronistic not to mention unfair. ture, aof, ff1 etc might seem locked in their time, but i still play them now and again and they arn't bad at all when you consider when they were made and what else was on offer back then. though i would disagree with kaz about when snk really started to shine, as i'd put it around '95. i mean samurai shodowns 1 &2, kof94, fatal fury special, all inspired moments of genius but it wasn't until kof95 and the first real bout did snk pull its socks up and the consistency of the games made between 95 and 99 is pretty amazing when you think about it. as for lame games, magician lord isn't too bad just, a bit too simple. same with league bowling which while fun has all the longenvity of the amount of time it takes to prepare a curry at your local takeaway. legend of success joe is laughably terrible, even by 1990 standards as is spinmaster, but to their credit, i have played a lot worse on other systems. but i think for a lot of that time snk were simply playing around with the hardware and game ideas to see what's hot and what's not. |
|
Harv
Neo Veteran
Did I err??
Posts: 472
|
Post by Harv on Mar 30, 2005 7:19:04 GMT -5
Totally agree with the Magician Lord statement...I really dont understand what people see in that game ? I thought it was just horrible all around. I enjoy a quick game of Stakes Winner 2 now and then since its fairly unique to most US gamers, sort of an aquired taste I guess... Number one is about half the game two is ,so I pretty much agree with you on that one. Yes mate, the first thing about Magician Lord that I didn't like was the music (very annoying, looped crap), it seemed to not compliment the gameplay which I soon realised also sucked-ass, I gave it my best shot though and tried to like it but nothin' doin'............. Havn't played Stakes 2, so i cant comment, but I will keep an open mind untill I do play it....managed to play Thrash Rally the other day and I can now see why some people refer to it as Trash Rally, that game was another big 'whoopsie!' , give me 'neo drift out' over that anyday  |
|
My Candy Cab. Super Neo Type II
